Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1184

reference
402-tree-1
name
1184
tree-preservation-order

undefined

402-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.027461 50.890510)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.027362 50.890499,-1.027367 50.890519,-1.027380 50.890537,-1.027402 50.890551,-1.027430 50.890560,-1.027460 50.890563,-1.027491 50.890560,-1.027519 50.890552,-1.027541 50.890538,-1.027556 50.890521,-1.027561 50.890501,-1.027557 50.890482,-1.027543 50.890464,-1.027521 50.890450,-1.027494 50.890441,-1.027463 50.890437,-1.027432 50.890440,-1.027404 50.890449,-1.027382 50.890463,-1.027367 50.890480,-1.027362 50.890499)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL